Graeme’s

If this is the market working, what is failure?

Posted by Graeme in Market failure
at 7:54 am on Monday, 31 March 2008

Brain Caplan thinks markets work fine despite having to wait 19 years to be able to a product with a tiny marginal cost of production: i.e. he spent 19 years waiting on the supplier’s whims just to buy allowed to buy some music. (more…)

Comments(0)

Why tax havens are fraudulent

Posted by Graeme in Economics, Politics
at 8:50 am on Friday, 29 February 2008

I usually enjoy reading Economic Logic, but this post defending tax havens seems badly wrong headed to me. It misses the essentially fraudulent character of tax havens. (more…)

Comments(0)

Alan Sugar fails to understand education

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Economics
at 7:20 am on Monday, 11 February 2008

Alan Sugar has called for “enterprise lessons” in schools. While a capitalist economy may benefit from there being some people like Alan Sugar, I see absolutely no evidence that we need more of them. (more…)

Comments (1)

Beyond capitalism?

Posted by Graeme in Economics
at 12:55 pm on Tuesday, 15 January 2008

This blog post by an academic economist raises a question that I am convinced we can already see part of the answer to. Industries that have a negligible marginal cost of production (media, software, etc.) demand a different economc system. (more…)

Comments(0)

Northern Rock should have been allowed to fail

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Economics
at 10:05 am on Friday, 14 September 2007

Willem Buiter is quite right to criticise the Bank of England’s bailout of Northern Rock. The message to bank directors and shareholders is quite clear: “take big risks, and if they go wrong the taxpayer will pay for your mistakes, if they work, you can keep the profit”. (more…)

Comments (2)

Abolish planning laws; solve housing “crisis”

Posted by Graeme in Economics, Politics
at 10:15 am on Wednesday, 22 August 2007

Imagine that the UK had enough housing that every single household occupied a detached or semi-detached house (two thirds of them in detached houses) and all the country’s 12 million currently occupied terraced houses, maisonettes and flats were empty. You might think that to provide so much housing we would need to “concrete over the countryside”, in fact we would need to switch just 2.5% of the UK’s land area to urban residential use. Switching much less would provide a more than adequate supply. (more…)

Comments (1)

The end of academic publishing

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Economics, Media, Shares
at 7:20 am on Thursday, 26 July 2007

It has been clear to many analysts (including myself) for years that publishers of academic journals were facing the slow death of their business. Despite the view of publishers and the more optimistic analysts that peer reviews journals were irreplaceable, the evidence continues to emerge for a slow, but certain, decline. (more…)

Comments (2)

Fixed rates will not make housing affordable

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Economics, Politics
at 9:38 am on Tuesday, 10 July 2007

I find it hard to believe that encouraging long term fixed interest mortgages, as the government plans to, will really make housing more affordable. Here is why: (more…)

Comments(0)

The end of the housing affordability argument?

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Economics
at 7:04 am on Friday, 6 July 2007

The Council of mortgage lenders says that yesterday’s interest rate raise “will leave more households financially stretched“, with an especially marked impact on the two million people close to coming off fixed rates. Are we hearing the end of the argument that housing remains “affordable” thanks to low interest rates, despite the high ratio of prices to incomes?

Comments(0)

Spreading greed

Posted by Graeme in Economics, Life, Politics
at 10:26 am on Friday, 29 June 2007

According to economist Robert H Frank, economics students become more selfish as a result of spending years immersed in the study of economic theory that is based on the idea that people act selfishly (or “rationally”, as economists describe it.

What effect does living in a neo-liberal capitalist society that is based on exactly the same assumptions have on people?

Comments(0)