Graeme’s

Glib beats insightful

Posted by Graeme in Media, Software
at 7:16 am on Tuesday, 13 May 2008

Paul Graham’s essay, Hackers and Painters, is very popular with some programmers. I just found a hilarious refutation of it, called Dabblers and Blowhards.

The interesting thing for me is that Paul Graham’s audience are just as enthusiastic (if not more so) when he writes rubbish about things he knows nothing about, as when he writes insightfully about things he is an expert on. (more…)

Comments (1)

Wired’s open source myth

Posted by Graeme in Software, Wrong
at 12:14 pm on Wednesday, 26 March 2008

Wired has an interesting twist on the tired old myth that “open source is developed by volunteers”, that has been. The new twist is that it reverses the usual myth that it is not possible to make money from open source: instead the wrong people will make the money and it will all fall apart. Unsurprisingly this flies in the face of the facts.

(more…)

Comments(0)

Incompetence from The Economist

Posted by Graeme in Wrong
at 9:28 am on Wednesday, 6 February 2008

The Economist’s coverage of Microsoft’s bid for Yahoo has apparently been written by someone who thinks that Yahoo is primarily a search engine. It has been written in complete ignorance of both the competition concerns and the major difficulties of integrating the businesses. (more…)

Comments (1)

The myth of environmental myths

Posted by Graeme in Wrong
at 5:24 am on Tuesday, 14 August 2007

Time for another sample of incompetent journalism, this time from The Times. The headline claims that walking to the shops damages the planet more than going by car. Of course this is not even remotely true, and a few seconds thought is enough to tear the argument apart. (more…)

Comments(0)

The end of academic publishing

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Economics, Media, Shares
at 7:20 am on Thursday, 26 July 2007

It has been clear to many analysts (including myself) for years that publishers of academic journals were facing the slow death of their business. Despite the view of publishers and the more optimistic analysts that peer reviews journals were irreplaceable, the evidence continues to emerge for a slow, but certain, decline. (more…)

Comments (2)

My favourite terrorists

Posted by Graeme in Politics, Wrong
at 7:08 am on Wednesday, 4 July 2007

The terrorists responsible for the London and Glasgow airport “car bombs” are my favourite kind: bumbling idiots who could not explode a jar of nitroglycerine. I feel a lot safer,knowing how incompetent they are. My main worry is that some of the suspects are doctors: if they planned this, how did they get through medical school? (more…)

Comments(0)

Nortel demonstrates how not to do PR

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Media
at 11:07 am on Wednesday, 23 May 2007

Nortel has prevented a former subsidiary, Blade, from buying from a rival. The resulting publicity is far more damaging to Nortel than the original, far less widely read coverage, of Blade’s choice of a PBX from Fonality (based on the open source Asterisk) over Nortels own products. (more…)

Comments(0)

Innumerate Polly

Posted by Graeme in Economics, Wrong
at 8:39 am on Wednesday, 4 April 2007

Anyone even vague numerate reading this article by Polly Toynbee would would have probably spotted where it went wrong. It is very hard to read it without thinking “surely that £5bn must be a reccuring annual amount whereas as she is comparing it to one off amounts”. David Smith confirms that this is the case. (more…)

Comments(0)

The amazing Slashdot dupes

Posted by Graeme in Internet, Wrong
at 1:41 pm on Monday, 19 March 2007

IT website Slashdot, is well known for repeatedly posting the same stories. Most readers no longer even comment on this — or even notice. I am therefore keep an online record of the worst examples . (more…)

Comments(0)

Wrong again, BBC

Posted by Graeme in Software, Wrong
at 2:37 pm on Monday, 22 January 2007

I have blogged about this before, but the BBC were good enough to give me a superb example to technology journalists getting things wrong. (more…)

Comments (2)