Graeme’s

Nortel demonstrates how not to do PR

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment, Media at 11:07 am on Wednesday, 23 May 2007

Nortel has prevented a former subsidiary, Blade, from buying from a rival. The resulting publicity is far more damaging to Nortel than the original, far less widely read coverage, of Blade’s choice of a PBX from Fonality (based on the open source Asterisk) over Nortels own products. (more…)

Comments(0)

Innumerate Polly

Posted by Graeme in Economics, Wrong at 8:39 am on Wednesday, 4 April 2007

Anyone even vague numerate reading this article by Polly Toynbee would would have probably spotted where it went wrong. It is very hard to read it without thinking “surely that £5bn must be a reccuring annual amount whereas as she is comparing it to one off amounts”. David Smith confirms that this is the case. (more…)

Comments(0)

The amazing Slashdot dupes

Posted by Graeme in Internet, Wrong at 1:41 pm on Monday, 19 March 2007

IT website Slashdot, is well known for repeatedly posting the same stories. Most readers no longer even comment on this — or even notice. I am therefore keep an online record of the worst examples . (more…)

Comments(0)

Wrong again, BBC

Posted by Graeme in Software, Wrong at 2:37 pm on Monday, 22 January 2007

I have blogged about this before, but the BBC were good enough to give me a superb example to technology journalists getting things wrong. (more…)

Comments (2)

Vodafone’s loss that wasn’t

Posted by Graeme in Shares, Wrong at 9:22 am on Friday, 15 September 2006

According to most of the press Vodafone made a £15bn loss in the 2005/6 financial year. The largest loss ever made by a British company. In fact, it would be more accurate to say that the company made a real profit but an accounting loss. (more…)

Comments(0)

Volunteers? No.

Posted by Graeme in Software, Wrong at 9:33 am on Thursday, 14 September 2006

I have noticed that the media make serious factual mistakes when covering any topic about which I have any real knowledge. This applies even to supposedly quality media. I can only assume that what I read about topics/countries/issues that I have no particular knowledge is equally wrong. (more…)

Comments(0)