<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Business and Investment on Graeme&#39;s</title>
		<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/categories/business-and-investment/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Business and Investment on Graeme&#39;s</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:27:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://pietersz.co.uk/categories/business-and-investment/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Not just a CO2 shortage - the economy is broken</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2018/07/co2-shortage-economy-broken/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2018/07/co2-shortage-economy-broken/</guid>
				<description>Shortages happen. A shortage of a gas that is vital to the manufacture of everything from beer to pain killers may look like just another unfortunate occurrence, but it is really a product of the way a &amp;ldquo;neo-liberal&amp;rdquo; economy works: globalisation and centralisation.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Taylor Swift on Apple Music - translated</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2015/06/taylor-swift-apple-translated/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 05:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2015/06/taylor-swift-apple-translated/</guid>
				<description>As Taylor Swift seems to have difficult saying what she means, so I thought I would provide a plain English translation of what she has to say about Apple Music.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Smarterer - a broken recruitement tool</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2013/08/smarterer-broken-recruitment/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2013/08/smarterer-broken-recruitment/</guid>
				<description>Having taken a number of Smarterer tests I find it scary that people use it as a recruitment tool. The tests are unreliable and meaningless. First, I will explain what is wrong about my scores — and I am complaining more about scores being to high than too low, so there is no personal grudge here. Then a few quick thoughts on the reasons.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The real purpose of DRM</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2013/03/real-purpose-drm/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2013/03/real-purpose-drm/</guid>
				<description>Ian Hickson, maintainer of the HTML5 specification, argues that &lt;a href=&#34;https://plus.google.com/107429617152575897589/posts/iPmatxBYuj2&#34;&gt;the real purpose of DRM is to give content providers leverage over device manufacturers.&lt;/a&gt; Although this is true for some applications of DRM, in many cases the purpose is to lock customers to particular devices and services, and to raise &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/barriers-to-entry/&#34;&gt;barriers to entry&lt;/a&gt; against new devices and services.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Takeover Panel claims copyright on regulatory information</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2013/03/takeover-panel-copyright/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 05:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2013/03/takeover-panel-copyright/</guid>
				<description>The Takeover Panel (which regulated mergers and takeovers inn the UK) has sent me an email telling me that reproducing the list of takeover offers (i.e. a list of company names and dates) would be a breach of copyright, and that they would be unlikely to allow commercial reproduction except though &amp;ldquo;official news channels&amp;rdquo;.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Insider trading IS harmful, but legalise it anyway</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/09/legalise-insider-trading/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/09/legalise-insider-trading/</guid>
				<description>The usual argument in favour of legalising insider trading is that it is not actually harmful (or even beneficial) to investors. I think that insider trading is extremely harmful and in-ethical, but it should be legalised anyway. My reasons are the difficulties in enforcing the law, and the probable effects on markets of legalisation.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The greater fool effect outside bubbles</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/05/widergreater-fool/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/05/widergreater-fool/</guid>
				<description>The &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/greater-fool/&#34;&gt;greater fool&lt;/a&gt; effect is well established as a key mechanism that allows bubbles to inflate to ludicrous valuations: investors who know prices are too high keep buying.  Prices can stay too high in a similar way outside a bubble: not necessarily massively over-valued or in the context of a broader market bubble.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The unnoticed megatrend</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/03/unnoticed-megatrend/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/03/unnoticed-megatrend/</guid>
				<description>Investors, and others who try to predict the future, are often fond of thinking in terms of &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/megatrend/&#34;&gt;megatrends&lt;/a&gt;. Changes in demographics, climate, technology and culture are often discussed. One that I believe to be the most significant of all is rarely mentioned, and I have never seen the implications discussed. It is also hard to accept, because it appears to be disproved by experience.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What is wrong with price/book value</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/02/wrong-pricebook-value/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2012/02/wrong-pricebook-value/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;As so often, &lt;a href=&#34;https://twitter.com/#!/RichardBeddard/status/162589353556709376&#34;&gt;Richard Beddard tweeted something interesting&lt;/a&gt; that I had to respond to.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The linked PDF argues that &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/price-book/&#34;&gt;price to book value&lt;/a&gt; is the most useful valuation measure, more so that earnigs, for two reasons:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Nokia &#43; MS: two failures do not make a success</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2011/02/nokia-failures-success/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2011/02/nokia-failures-success/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;There are two things that strike me about the alliance agreed between Nokia and Microsoft:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Combining Nokia&amp;rsquo;s failed smartphone strategy, with Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s failed smartphone operating system, is not a receipe for success.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Nokia will now have three smartphone platforms, possibly falling back to two. This continued fragmentation is hardly a great way to get the critical mass then need.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Risk and rationality, investment and life</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2010/11/risk-rationality-investment/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2010/11/risk-rationality-investment/</guid>
				<description>Its fairly obvious that people are not, except for a few analytical souls, rational about risk: they worry obsessively about small risks and ignore ones that matter, and they are often no more rational about investing.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Volatility is the best risk measure</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2010/10/volatility-risk-measure/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2010/10/volatility-risk-measure/</guid>
				<description>I have just rewritten the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/volatility/&#34;&gt;Moneyterms article on volatility&lt;/a&gt; to cover common criticisms of volatility as a risk measure. The key points are that volatility makes intuitive sense when considered properly, correctly corrects for increased upside, and that the critics are unable to come up with a better measure.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Great crash and credit crunch similarities.</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/crash-crunch-similarities/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/crash-crunch-similarities/</guid>
				<description>I have been reading Galbraith&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;The Great Crash of 1929&lt;/em&gt; and a lot of similarities have struck me, not all of which seem to have been noticed by everyone.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Gold is not an investment</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/gold-not-investment/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/gold-not-investment/</guid>
				<description>&lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.iii.co.uk/gold1/&#34;&gt;Richard Beddard&lt;/a&gt; has been annoying the gold bugs. This puts me in the unusual position of agreeing with him.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Google&#39;s &#34;concession&#34; to Murdoch</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/googles-murdoch/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/googles-murdoch/</guid>
				<description>Everyone seems to be interpreting the changes made by Google News as a victory for Murdoch and others who are trying t extract payments from Google in return for making their content searchable through Google. I disagree, and think it is designed to make life more difficult for those putting up pay walls.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>How to fix the banking system</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/fix-banking/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/12/fix-banking/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a bit less ambitious than my &lt;a href=&#34;https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/fix-capitalism/&#34;&gt;plan to reform capitalism&lt;/a&gt;, but the principles are the same.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;too-big-to-fail-is-too-big-to-exist&#34;&gt;Too big to fail is too big to exist&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Big banks create too much &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/systemic-risk/&#34;&gt;systemic risk&lt;/a&gt;, and are far too much of a strain on government finances when they need to be bailed out.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Peak Google?</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/peak-google/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/peak-google/</guid>
				<description>Alan Patrick is sticking his neck out and &lt;a href=&#34;http://broadstuff.com/archives/1970-Is-Google,-like,-Ovah.html&#34;&gt;calling the top on Google&amp;rsquo;s growth&lt;/a&gt;. I am not convinced, and there are specific points that I have comments on.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The market is just inefficient enough</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/market-inefficient/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/market-inefficient/</guid>
				<description>Richard Beddard&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href=&#34;https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/efficient-market-evidenc/#comments&#34;&gt;extensive comments&lt;/a&gt; on my last post on efficient markets deserve a full reply. He is correct that I did not make it clear that the paper says that a behavioural explanation of the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/abnormal-returns/&#34;&gt;abnormal returns&lt;/a&gt; is possible.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Evidence for market efficiency</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/efficient-market-evidenc/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/efficient-market-evidenc/</guid>
				<description>A working paper that is &lt;a href=&#34;http://empiricalfinanceresearch.blogspot.com/2009/11/investment-potential-rating-10-1-worst.html&#34;&gt;nicely summarised on the Empirical Finance Research Blog&lt;/a&gt; shows how markets react to information rapidly, that they are not perfectly efficient, and how those setting the efficient market price are rewarded.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Time for growth investing</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/growth-investing/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/growth-investing/</guid>
				<description>I am hardly the first person to recommend switching to &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/growth_investing/&#34;&gt;growth investing&lt;/a&gt;. There has recently been crop of strategists arguing that we are at the point in the cycle where growth is likely to out-perform, as economic growth returns.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Value investing, efficient markets and CAPM</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/value-investing/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/value-investing/</guid>
				<description>The &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/value-effect/&#34;&gt;value effect&lt;/a&gt;, does not cast doubt on the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/efficient-markets/&#34;&gt;efficient market hypothesis&lt;/a&gt; (as &lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.iii.co.uk/value-investing-tools-and-techniques-for-intelligent-investment/&#34;&gt;Richard Beddard suggests&lt;/a&gt;), but on &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/capm/&#34;&gt;CAPM&lt;/a&gt;. Nonetheless, I still think investors should use CAPM, or something very like it.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Proof clever people diversify.</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/clever-diversify/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/clever-diversify/</guid>
				<description>its true. &lt;a href=&#34;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1441512&#34;&gt;Research shows&lt;/a&gt; that the higher people&amp;rsquo;s IQ:</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Efficient markets, bamboozled journalists and stupid regulators</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/efficent-markets-journalists-regulators/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/11/efficent-markets-journalists-regulators/</guid>
				<description>The media seems to have reached a consensus that the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/efficient-markets/&#34;&gt;efficient markets hypothesis&lt;/a&gt; (EMH) has been discredited by the financial crises. I have been somewhat bemused by this, as I could not see the connection.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What&#39;s wrong with software patents</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/08/software-patents/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2009/08/software-patents/</guid>
				<description>A quick summary of things that came up in a discussion that I was surprised was not evident to most people:</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Alan Sugar fails to understand education</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2008/02/sugar-style-education/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2008/02/sugar-style-education/</guid>
				<description>Alan Sugar has called for &amp;ldquo;enterprise lessons&amp;rdquo; in schools. While a capitalist economy may benefit from there being some people like Alan Sugar, I see absolutely no evidence that we need more of them.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Blog split</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2008/01/blog-split/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2008/01/blog-split/</guid>
				<description>I have effectively split this blog into two. I will stop posting on investment and finance related topics here, and instead post on my new &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/blog/&#34;&gt;blog on my Moneyterms site&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Good ratio, bad ratio</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/12/good-bad-valuation-ratio/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/12/good-bad-valuation-ratio/</guid>
				<description>I recently added a page on the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/naked-pe/&#34;&gt;naked PE&lt;/a&gt; to Money Terms. &lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.iii.co.uk/naked-pe-recognised/&#34;&gt;A post in response to this by&lt;/a&gt; Richard Beddard (thanks to whom I came across the ratio in the first place) lead me to a clearer description of why it is good — and why the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/peg/&#34;&gt;PEG&lt;/a&gt; is bad.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Wisdom of crowds does not apply to stock picking</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/11/wisdom-crowds-apply/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/11/wisdom-crowds-apply/</guid>
				<description>I have, over the last few weeks, read a few different articles about &amp;ldquo;social stock picking&amp;rdquo; which aims to &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/d.quercia/others/wisdom.html&#34;&gt;apply the &amp;ldquo;wisdom of crowds&amp;rdquo; to stock picking&lt;/a&gt;. This is neither new, nor a good idea.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>CAPM: wrong but useful</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/capm-useful-wrong/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/capm-useful-wrong/</guid>
				<description>I previously wrote a &lt;a href=&#34;https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/capm-is-ok/&#34;&gt;defence of CAPM&lt;/a&gt; in reply to &lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.iii.co.uk/2007/10/03/capm-is-crap-there-is-more-to-behavioural-investing/&#34;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;. Even given that the &lt;a href=&#34;http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/finance/papers/capm2004a.pdf&#34;&gt;empirical empirical evidence&lt;/a&gt; shows that high beta portfolios do not generate higher returns, the beta is still useful for investors.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Forget index tracking</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/forget-index-tracking/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/forget-index-tracking/</guid>
				<description>I have been leaning towards &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/passive-investing/&#34;&gt;passive investment&lt;/a&gt; for sometime, but I had not seen any evidence or argument that helped decide whether &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/tracker_fund/&#34;&gt;tracker funds&lt;/a&gt; or buy and hold &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/mechanical-investing/&#34;&gt;mechanical strategies&lt;/a&gt; were better. Thanks to the &lt;a href=&#34;http://behaviouralinvesting.blogspot.com/2007/09/something-boglehead-wouldnt-want-you-to.html&#34;&gt;Behavioural Investing blog&lt;/a&gt; I found &lt;a href=&#34;http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/~rlwctr/papers/0429.pdf&#34;&gt;this illuminating paper&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>CAPM is OK</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/capm-is-ok/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/10/capm-is-ok/</guid>
				<description>&lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.iii.co.uk/2007/10/03/capm-is-crap-there-is-more-to-behavioural-investing/&#34;&gt;Richard Beddard not only endorses a condemnation of CAPM, but he wants to know if I am reading&lt;/a&gt;. I say it is the worst valuation model, apart from all the others.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New on Money Terms</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/new-money-terms/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/new-money-terms/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;The latest additions to Money Terms are:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/passive-investing/&#34;&gt;passive investing&lt;/a&gt;, which adds a more general discussion to subjects already coverd by other entries,&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;the closely related trio of &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/crash/&#34;&gt;crash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/correction/&#34;&gt;correction&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/bull-run/&#34;&gt;bull run&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;an explanation of what &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/embedded-computers/&#34;&gt;embedded computers&lt;/a&gt; are.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>A better PEG ratio</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/smoothed-peg-ratio/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/smoothed-peg-ratio/</guid>
				<description>While making some improvements to the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/peg/&#34;&gt;Moneyterms explanation of the PEG ratio&lt;/a&gt;, I started thinking about ways of addressing the weaknesses of this ratio. The main problem with it is its short term nature, which makes shares that have mere enjoyed spikes in their growth, look like bargains.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Northern Rock should have been allowed to fail</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/northen-should-allowed/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/northen-should-allowed/</guid>
				<description>Willem Buiter is quite right to &lt;a href=&#34;http://maverecon.blogspot.com/2007/09/northern-rock-paper-tiger.html&#34;&gt;criticise the Bank of England&amp;rsquo;s bailout of Northern Rock&lt;/a&gt;. The message to bank directors and shareholders is quite clear: &amp;ldquo;take big risks, and if they go wrong the taxpayer will pay for your mistakes, if they work, you can keep the profit&amp;rdquo;.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New Moneyterms site</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/moneyterms-site/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/moneyterms-site/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I have moved &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/&#34;&gt;Moneyterms&lt;/a&gt; to new hosting and to the wonderful &lt;a href=&#34;http://modxcms.com/&#34;&gt;Modx&lt;/a&gt; platform. The time spent developing the new site was minimal, but I also replaced all the automatically generated &amp;ldquo;related page&amp;rdquo; links with manually chosen lists, which was a lot of very tedious work. It should improve site navigation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I also removed the &amp;ldquo;Guides&amp;rdquo; section, as it was simply not good enough. It will reappear with rewritten material.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now that is behind me I have started adding new entries again, starting with &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/style-index/&#34;&gt;style index&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/discount-rate/&#34;&gt;discount rate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/long-term-pe/&#34;&gt;long term PE&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/market-neutral/&#34;&gt;market neutral&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/synthetic-security/&#34;&gt;synthetic security&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Actively manage your pension</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/active-pension/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/active-pension/</guid>
				<description>Most people are quite happy to allow a fund manager to look after their pension, even those who actively manage other investments. I suggest the opposite. There are very good reasons for concentrating on your pension.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>More bull market?</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/market/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/09/market/</guid>
				<description>&lt;a href=&#34;http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2007/09/06/7100/says-morgan-stanleys-draaisma/&#34;&gt;FT Alphaville is skeptical&lt;/a&gt; of Morgan Stanley strategist Teun Draaisma&amp;rsquo;s bullish outlook. Looking at the arguments he makes in detail, I think he has a point, although I would be more worried about the downside.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lifecycle investing: when to switch?</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/08/lifecycle-investing/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/08/lifecycle-investing/</guid>
				<description>The &lt;a href=&#34;https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/08/choosing-tracker-funds/&#34;&gt;comments on a recent post&lt;/a&gt; questioned whether life cycle investing is a good idea. I think the idea is sound, but I think it is important to point out that thinking purely in terms of terminal wealth at retirement over-simplifies things.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Choosing tracker funds</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/08/choosing-tracker-funds/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/08/choosing-tracker-funds/</guid>
				<description>In a comment on my recent post on why investor&amp;rsquo;s should not try to out-perform, &lt;a href=&#34;https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/investor-sucker/#comments&#34;&gt;Robin Sole brought up&lt;/a&gt; the important issue of how to choose &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/tracker_fund/&#34;&gt;tracker funds&lt;/a&gt;, and the lack of a good totally passive approach to investment.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What to avoid: Large cap growth</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/avoid-large-growth/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/avoid-large-growth/</guid>
				<description>Given the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/size-effect/&#34;&gt;size effect&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/size-effect/&#34;&gt;value effect&lt;/a&gt;, it would appear that the worst investment style is large cap growth. I spent some time looking at returns on the &lt;a href=&#34;http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html&#34;&gt;French Fama research portfolios&lt;/a&gt; and both effects seem to hold, but with some interesting twists.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The end of academic publishing</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/academic-publishing-margins/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/academic-publishing-margins/</guid>
				<description>It has been clear to many analysts (including myself) for years that publishers of academic journals were facing the slow death of their business. Despite the view of publishers and the more optimistic analysts that peer reviews journals were irreplaceable, the evidence continues to emerge for a slow, but certain, decline.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>You, investor, are a sucker: part 2</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/investor-sucker-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/investor-sucker-2/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://blog.iii.co.uk/?p=215&#34;&gt;Richard Beddard&amp;rsquo;s response&lt;/a&gt; to my &lt;a href=&#34;https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/investor-sucker/&#34;&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt;, is not the end of the argument, although I will go along with his approach and answer his questionnaire.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;My view of what it takes to out-perform is not very different from Richard&amp;rsquo;s, but it is an arithmetical necessity that most investors will not out-perform. I am very skeptical of anyone who claims that they are in the minority who can reliably do so.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The City and the tax haven</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/city-haven/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/city-haven/</guid>
				<description>Richard Murphy has a &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/07/23/what-is-a-tax-haven/&#34;&gt;good definition of a tax haven&lt;/a&gt;, but I disagree with his idea that having a large financial services sector is an important characteristic, although I do agree with his view that the UK and Ireland are both tax havens.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Moneysupermarket IPO and web business valuation</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/money-supermarket/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/money-supermarket/</guid>
				<description>Whenever there is a website IPO, those of us with profitable websites pay attention. While a small, privately owned website will need to be valued at a steep discount to a large, listed business, it is a useful indicator of value.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Web metrics are insane</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/web-metrics/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/web-metrics/</guid>
				<description>To be precise, trying to find a single set of metrics to compare the audience of different types of websites it insane. That is why Nielson/Netrating&amp;rsquo;s decision to measure time spent on websites, rather than page views, does not really matter much. Those looking for a single measure across all websites are reducing a mistake of the dotcom boom.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Fixed rates will not make housing affordable</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/fixed-rates-hosuing/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/fixed-rates-hosuing/</guid>
				<description>I find it hard to believe that encouraging long term fixed interest mortgages, as the &lt;a href=&#34;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/economics/story/0,,2122703,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=networkfront&#34;&gt;government plans to&lt;/a&gt;, will really make housing more affordable. Here is why:</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The end of the housing affordability argument?</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/housing-affordability/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/housing-affordability/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;The Council of mortgage lenders says that yesterday&amp;rsquo;s interest rate raise &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/media/press/1210&#34;&gt;will leave more households financially stretched&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rdquo;, with an especially marked impact on the two million people close to coming off fixed rates. Are we hearing the end of the argument that housing remains &amp;ldquo;affordable&amp;rdquo; thanks to low interest rates, despite the high ratio of prices to incomes?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>You, investor, are a sucker</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/investor-sucker/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/investor-sucker/</guid>
				<description>You think you can out-perform the market do you? Millions of people apparently think they can: anyone who invests actively is implicitly claiming just that. Unless you are one of a tiny handful of people who have proven they can do it consistently, I do not believe you. You are just wasting money funding the huge industry that sells suckers like you financial information and advice.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Insider trading</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/insider-trading/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/07/insider-trading/</guid>
				<description>There is nothing surprising about this &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/occpapers/op23.pdf&#34;&gt;FSA study&lt;/a&gt; found strong evidence that about a fifth of results announcements and a third of takeovers were preceded by insider trading. My own experience, the scale of the opportunities, and the number and nature of the people involved all lead to the expectation that it happends.</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Money terms update</title>
				<link>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/06/money-terms-update/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://pietersz.co.uk/2007/06/money-terms-update/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I have done too much on Money Terms recently to list it all here, but a few high lights are worth mentioning. I learnt a lot writing the piece on the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/value-effect/&#34;&gt;value effect&lt;/a&gt;: it needed a fair amount of research on the evidence for it. The same goes for the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/dumb-money/&#34;&gt;dumb money effect&lt;/a&gt;. This was less true for the &lt;a href=&#34;http://moneyterms.co.uk/size-effect/&#34;&gt;size effect&lt;/a&gt; which I have been interested in for a while. Having looked at the evidence, I think now think the dumb money effect is the most interesting of these.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
