Graeme's

Was Marx right?

Posted by Graeme in Economics,Politics at 9:20 am on Tuesday, 15 February 2011

One reason that Marx’s prediction that capitalism would lead to increasing inequality, and then failure, was wrong, was that advancing technology lead to increases in prosperity for almost everyone. Slowing technological change will mean an increase in inequality, so Marx may have another chance to be proved right. (more…)

Comments (3)

Nokia + MS: two failures do not make a success

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment at 11:34 am on Friday, 11 February 2011

There are two things that strike me about the alliance agreed between Nokia and Microsoft:

  1. Combining Nokia’s failed smartphone strategy, with Microsoft’s failed smartphone operating system, is not a receipe for success.
  2. Nokia will now have three smartphone platforms, possibly falling back to two. This continued fragmentation is hardly a great way to get the critical mass then need.

(more…)

Comments (2)

Are newspapers content farms?

Posted by Graeme in Internet,Media at 2:37 pm on Wednesday, 9 February 2011

I disagreed with a recent blog post by Alan Patrick which described the Huffington Post as a content farm. I do not think that the alleged lack of original content at the Huffpo is any worse than at many newspapers: so I concluded that it is not a content farm. It could be interpreted the other way: newspapers are content farms too. (more…)

Comments (4)

The Huffington Post and AOL

Posted by Graeme in Internet,Media,Shares at 9:14 am on Tuesday, 8 February 2011

The Huffington Post may not be a bad buy at the price AOL is paying, but that does not mean that AOL is right to buy it. (more…)

Comments (1)

The plutocracy is no meritocracy

Posted by Graeme in Economics,Politics at 6:52 am on Tuesday, 25 January 2011

Many of the spate of recent articles on the super-rich, such as the influential one in The Atlantic have accepted the idea that the plutocracy is meritocratic: the wealth is earned. I have my doubts, and had a look at how and where the richest of the super-rich made their money. (more…)

Comments (3)

Don’t trust complex climate models

Posted by Graeme in Uncategorized at 12:14 pm on Tuesday, 18 January 2011

My previous post did not make it clear why climate models are so similar to complex financial models, which failed so spectacularly. (more…)

Comments (3)

Why democracy will die

Posted by Graeme in Politics at 11:26 am on Friday, 10 December 2010

In the 1990s it looked as though democracy was spreading irresistibly. Not only do I think this trend has reversed, but that there will be very little public objection to it, and the push-back against it will be comparatively little even from those who seek to oppose it. It will happen slowly, but democracy is dying. (more…)

Comments (4)

The internet as an instrument of control

Posted by Graeme in Internet,Media,Politics at 12:46 pm on Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Conventional wisdom has long been that the internet (and IT and modern telecommunications) are hard for governments to control and empower anyone willing to use them — activists and protesters in particular. I have long been sceptical, but I think its now clear I was right. (more…)

Comments (2)

Risk and rationality, investment and life

Posted by Graeme in Business & Investment,Life at 12:09 pm on Wednesday, 24 November 2010

Its fairly obvious that people are not, except for a few analytical souls, rational about risk: they worry obsessively about small risks and ignore ones that matter, and they are often no more rational about investing. (more…)

Comments disabled

Financial models and climate models

Posted by Graeme in Politics at 8:59 am on Saturday, 6 November 2010

A few years ago we were assured that complex financial models used by banks could be relied on to correctly assess financial risk. This was supposed to ensure that banks would stay solvent, and the financial system stable. It turned out that insufficient back-testing, subtle pressure on those building the models to produce the “right” results, and the intrinsic problems of complex models, meant that the models were far from good enough.

We are also asked to trust complex models of climate change that predict rising temperatures. I am inclined to distrust complex models in general, but leaving that aside, are these likely to suffer the shortcomings of the bank’s risk models? (more…)

Comments disabled